
As IT professionals, our job is to align technology with business objectives, helping the business drive increased revenue and performance. That can be challenging, as for many shops, the operational burden of IT has not gone away.
Finding the balance between maintaining a quality lights-on operation, managing costs, and driving operational improvements to a higher IT maturity level is a significant challenge. The day-to-day complexity of managing an IT organization requires full attention and the lion’s share of available resources.
There’s limited bandwidth to focus on process improvements. IT has to keep pace and provide value during a time where disruptive technologies are changing the way services need to be delivered. The business expects IT to provide technology services in support of the business strategy and to demonstrate technical leadership that could influence market differentiation. These expectations require IT to provide consistent quality of service and develop capabilities that lead to technical innovation. To support this, IT must have a level of IT service management maturity to be able to manage demand and the quality delivery of that demand.
So how do you know where you are and where you need to go? First things first: conduct an IT service management (ITSM) assessment to baseline your current level of maturity, identify gaps, and develop an improvement plan. With an assessment, the end-to-end process framework and organizational capabilities are baselined to provide a platform to build upon. Developing a service-improvement plan emphasizing process improvements, capabilities, and agility will improve IT’s ability to adapt to change and sustain the quality delivery of services.
Specifically, being able to outline the key service delivery constraints by identifying root cause is a way to link the symptoms to problems and fixes that improve service and benefit the IT team and customers alike.
The illustration below is an example of a high-level assessment that outlines common IT constraints and potential impacts to the ITIL processes.
Common IT Service Delivery Constraints | |||||||
Addressable ITIL Process | Service Instability | Delivery Lead Times | Quality of Service | Ability to Scale | Cost of Service | Lack of Innovation | Overall IT Ineffectiveness |
Services Strategy | |||||||
Strategy Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ||
Business Relationship Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ |
Demand Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ |
Service Portfolio Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | |
Financial Management of IT Services | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ||
Service Design | |||||||
Design Coordination | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | |||
Service Catalog Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ||||
Service Level Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ |
Availability Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ||
Capacity Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ |
IT Service Continuity Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | |
IT Security Management System | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ||
Supplier Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ |
Service Transition | |||||||
Transition Planning & Support | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ |
Change Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | |
Service Asset & Configuration Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ||
Release & Deployment Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | |
Service Validation & Testing | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ||
Change Evaluation | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | |
Knowledge Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | |
Service Operations | |||||||
Event Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | |
Incident Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ||
Request Fulfillment | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ |
Problem Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | |
Identity Management | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ |
Continuous Process Improvement | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ | ⚠ |
This high-level assessment provides a starting point for potential areas of process improvements. Another level of detailed analysis would be required to assess each underlying process and the details needing to be addressed (resource, process, technology). Each process in itself is as an integral part to the overall ITSM delivery model.
Periodic assessments and service-improvement plans should be routine. IT is expected to constantly improve service delivery while providing value, and not necessarily by way of long-term projects. In essence, you have to change the tire while the car is moving. An assessment will provide insight to a path forward, but time is of the essence. Using a time-to-value approach will provide guidance in setting priorities on the list of improvement activities. Implementing improvements that yield some immediate benefit (time-value) demonstrates progress while the longer-term improvement plan is implemented.
These improvements to service and capabilities are visible and will boost IT’s value to the company. Easier said than done? Sure, but worth it.
This blog was contributed by Wavestone US’ Principal Consultants, Tony Ioele.
To learn more about Wavestone US’ services, click here.
4 Strategic Mistakes to Avoid When Defining Service Level Management Processes
Jun 01, 2023
Strategic errors made when defining service levels can have a detrimental, cascading effect on service level operational performance - leading to additional costs and service delays. Here are 4 strategic errors to avoid when defining service levels and instituting the SLM processes to govern them.
Optimizing the 3 Stages of Your Cloud Software Development Lifecycle
May 25, 2023
Your Cloud Optimization Strategy requires seamless coordination between optimization levers throughout the SDLC to produce and maintain effective cloud solutions. Discover best practices and improvement opportunities for each lever, where they fit in the SDLC, and how to synergize them effectively.
Have a Question? Just Ask
Whether you're looking for practical advice or just plain curious, our experienced principals are here to help. Check back weekly as we publish the most interesting questions and answers right here.